Introduction: During labour, the presence of meconium in the amniotic fluid can trigger a cascade of interventions that may not always be necessary. This blog post aims to shed light on the subject of meconium-stained liquor, examining the facts, dispelling myths, and exploring the implications of common medical practices.

Understanding Meconium: Meconium is a mixture found in amniotic fluid, primarily composed of water and various substances such as amniotic fluid, intestinal cells, and lanugo. It occurs in approximately 15-20% of births, and its presence has been linked to five potential reasons, although concrete evidence supporting these theories is lacking.

The Misconceptions: Contrary to popular belief, the presence of meconium alone does not necessarily indicate foetal distress or hypoxia. Research suggests that an abnormal foetal heart rate is a more reliable indicator. It is important to note that most babies born with meconium-stained liquor are actually in good condition.

The Risk of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS): While meconium-stained liquor can be a cause for concern, it is vital to understand that Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS) is a rare complication. Only around 2-5% of babies with meconium-stained liquor develop MAS, and of those, approximately 3-5% may experience severe consequences, including mortality. The risk of MAS can be influenced by factors such as prematurity, congenital abnormalities, and additional labour complications.

Common Practices and Their Implications: Ironically, some common medical practices implemented in response to meconium-stained liquor may increase the risk of hypoxia and MAS. These practices include inducing labour, breaking the waters artificially, causing stress to the mother, employing directed pushing, early cord clamping, and unnecessary suctioning.

The Fallacy of Routine Suctioning: Routine suctioning of a newborn’s airways, often performed without clear medical indication, is a contentious issue. Evidence-based guidelines generally recommend against routine suctioning unless the baby is unresponsive, floppy, and in need of resuscitation. Research suggests that routine suctioning does not reduce the risk of MAS and may actually induce gasping, potentially increasing the risk of meconium inhalation.

A Natural Approach: It is crucial to prioritise a gentle and natural approach when dealing with meconium-stained liquor. Suggestions to promote a less stressful birth experience include avoiding unnecessary interventions such as artificial rupture of membranes (ARM) and directed pushing. Creating a relaxing birth environment, encouraging slow and controlled delivery of the baby’s head to facilitate natural airway clearance, and delaying cord clamping for a smoother transition to breathing are also beneficial practices.

Conclusion: Meconium-stained liquor, though often seen as a cause for concern, does not always indicate fetal distress or hypoxia. While Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS) is a serious complication, it remains rare. By challenging routine interventions and focusing on a holistic approach to care, we can promote a safer and less stressful birth experience for both mother and baby. Trusting in the natural processes of birth and embracing evidence-based practices can help ensure better outcomes for all involved.